Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 19:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 14:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The picture shows 3 Bavarian Architectural Monuments
Hohenschwangau Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.
Hotel Alpenrose
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.
Neuschwanstein Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.
and 2 Protected Areas
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395500
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555537966
|
created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 08:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Uzman Naleer - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – nice composition and atmosphere. —Bruce1eetalk 09:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 21:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
- Info The Browsing Room and Manuscripts Reading Room at the Indiana State Library. The symbols along the ceiling are American printers' marks. Most of the room is paneled with walnut, and those bookshelf finials are owls -- one of the symbols of the library. Two-frame panorama. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Others
- Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A real talent, see here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- What an equipment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC) 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, great find. No coma, not even in the corners; maybe a little bit of spherical aberration, but it looks just natural here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
- Info A Fijian endemic. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition. Beautiful red bird and tasty branch, good focus on both, smooth bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Drawn to the composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – the geometric shapes are appealing. —Bruce1eetalk 07:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly, I think what Bruce said is what makes this photo so appealing.--SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The geometric shapes of the foreground, indeed, and also their contrast with the natural irregular shapes of the trees in the middle ground and of the mountains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 21:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info This is one of my favorite photos that would like to represent simplicity and serenity. - c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good. Wolverine X-eye 04:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Composition, mirror image, sky with pink cloud, and blue hour lightings -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile; pleasant evening atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Truly wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful light, colours, and atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness could be better but a great shot overall Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful landscape but sorry, IMO not an outstanding composition Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 17:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and lighting --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as always Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another one from the master of the "trains in fabulous landscapes" genre of photography. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 21:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think he has long been promoted from Master to Grandmaster. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, viaduc, and, as always, picture taken at the right moment with the train -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding – excellent composition, beautiful light and colours. The surroundings appear a bit soft, especially the bushes and trees look somewhat mushy, but that’s probably unavoidable due to the small sensor of the drone camera. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 09:27:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Jordan
- Info Temple of Zeus (Gerasa, Jerash - Jordan; معبد زيوس). My shot. - Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the picture is well taken and the ruins of the temple are great, of course. However, someone is selling T-shirts just there... a pity. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There's a problem at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Basile Morin But original. I dont know what is it. Will leave as it is. Stones are problem to "draw". --Mile (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 05:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but I doubt the symmetry of the left and right pillars. But maybe that wasn't symmetrical in reality either.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Famerborst. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive place and photograph. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The imperfect symmetry makes the picture interesting.--Ermell (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 22:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
- Info created by Максим Яковлєв - uploaded by Максим Яковлєв - nominated by Luda.slominska -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not particularly large and not very sharp either. For me, the level is higher with FP.--Ermell (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Ermell. It's a good QI, nice composition but a bit small for FP in 2024 for a reasonably common animal Cmao20 (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Have to agree with others — not very sharp image, thus lacking wow. Красный wanna talk? 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 21:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
- Info Also known as the Kererū. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not the best posture imo, but representative of the behaviour of the New Zealand pigeon. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- The ones we saw spent a lot of time eating! Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created by Rbrechko - uploaded by Rbrechko - nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Rbrechko (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 15:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
- Info Swedish rider Nils Anderberg during Gotland Grand National 2024. Created by ArildV - uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 16:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Nice action shot, plus a good composition. —Bruce1eetalk 17:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very lively.--Ermell (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captivating angle and good quality. If you could bring a bit more space at the bottom, I think it would be amazing. But still FP in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! Well balanced! -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nomination, votes and comments.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great action photo, well done Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressively beautiful shot, detailed, denoised without excess and with the bright background that does not disturb at all. Terragio67 (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Bruce1ee, Basile, Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment an English description will be useful, what about graffiti? no COM:FOP in Russia for artworks and it ruins the picture IMHO Ezarateesteban 16:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- These letters have some art style (not so original IMO, but still). Anyway, it's De minimis for me, while graffiti is an unwanted intrusion here and occupies less than 10% of the frame. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry I don't find the structure extraordinary, nor the composition with the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
America
-
Europe
-
Asia
-
Africa
-
World
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
- Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm agree with Cmao. -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Beautifully composed image. Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in black and white
- Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shooke (Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blue stamp removed, weird line under "Tacuari", and natural features deleted in comparison with the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
- Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
- Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I used to go to that place often when I lived in Londonː I recognize the mist in the early morning and the translucent colors of the regal building during the morning hours. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das ist kein Problem der R3. Mit welchem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm arbeitest Du denn? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have added the information as structured data. --Sandro Halank (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support great shot! --Granada (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot of this magician levitating a ball. I suspect that paddle has some sort of electric charge to keep the ball so still in the air. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 22:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
- Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Moroder — Preceding undated comment was added at 11:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support-Atudu (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice subject but the sharpness could be better Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
- Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per Basileː Shot of an expert hand. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
- Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
- Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
- Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating
fiveten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC) - Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done: description and categorization improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
- Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support (sharpness, why not f/8 or closer?) --XRay 💬 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
- Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others. No wow. Yann (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
- Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 01 Nov → Wed 06 Nov Sat 02 Nov → Thu 07 Nov Sun 03 Nov → Fri 08 Nov Mon 04 Nov → Sat 09 Nov Tue 05 Nov → Sun 10 Nov Wed 06 Nov → Mon 11 Nov
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 28 Oct → Wed 06 Nov Tue 29 Oct → Thu 07 Nov Wed 30 Oct → Fri 08 Nov Thu 31 Oct → Sat 09 Nov Fri 01 Nov → Sun 10 Nov Sat 02 Nov → Mon 11 Nov Sun 03 Nov → Tue 12 Nov Mon 04 Nov → Wed 13 Nov Tue 05 Nov → Thu 14 Nov Wed 06 Nov → Fri 15 Nov
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.